Not Just Any Republicans Will Do

There are two problems to be solved in 2010.

The first is obvious.  The Democrats are running the country into the ground and need to be removed.  The obvious failure of their socialist philosophy is lost to their power lust, and they have to be prevented from doing any more damage.  Obama in particular is a brainwashed and militant ideologue that makes me wish I was only living through the Carter presidency again.

However, there is a second problem with all of this.  In order to stop the damage and then start reversing it, not just any Republicans will do.  In fact, it’s not a stretch to state that if we put the Republicans back together as they were under Bush, our efforts will have been wholly wasted.  We’ll watch them revert to form, self-destruct again, and this time likely for good.

So, let’s start with what we know and come up with a plan.

1.)  The Republican National Committees are the primary way by which RINOs project their power and influence.  There’s no reason to believe that will ever change because the one thing RINOs do well is retain their undeserved jobs.  Fortunately, there’s no reason to believe they will become competent again, or return to their former relevance now that direct donations and alternative groups are forming.

Still, better safe than sorry.  To keep them from interfering with our efforts in the future, it’s time to end the Republican National Committees (RNC, NRSC, NRCC).  To accomplish this, continue to donate directly to your desired candidates.  Furthermore, if one of these committees chooses a candidate in the primary, end their aspirations there.  Repeated demonstrations that they have negative influence will dry up their big donors, choking them for cash.  We keep going until these groups exist only on paper and as a bad memory, and the RINOs will be that much less able to pull SNAFUs like Charlie Crist and Carly Fiorina.

By the way, they’re not going to help us in this campaign cycle.  We are the cavalry.  If we want our sorts of people elected, we’ll have to do it ourselves.

2.) If the candidates or representatives have demonstrated that they won’t even try to work out their differences with us and compromise with us on center-right legislation (see McCain for examples of this), they go.  No exceptions.  Not even the general election.  If they demonstrate repeatedly that they’re Democrats when the chips are down, it’s better to be stuck with an honest opponent than a backstabber.

“Conservative enough” works.  Democrats except when it doesn’t matter is a Democrat In All But Label Only (DIABLO) and doesn’t work.  Credit to Mark Steyn for the label.

Seriously, can you tell a McCain or a Snowe apart from a Democrat (other than during the elections)?  How about Specter, who became one when he didn’t get his way in a primary?  What worth is the label when socialism is just as bitter if it’s stamped with an “R”?

3.)  There is no team “Republican”.  This is going to be a hard one for a lot of people to finally swallow, and I speak from experience since I was a Republican loyalist once.  McCain’s presidential nomination was the straw that broke the camel’s back for me on that, and some of you may still be wishing that it could be like it was under Reagan again.

It can’t.  At best, we minimize RINO influence, but some will always slip through.  If you’re a loyal Republican, far too many will slip through and we’re back where we started.

Hence my conclusion.  The Republicans are not the team.  Their party structure is a means to an end.  It’s a convenient place to put worthwhile candidates we will support if they fight for us so we don’t have to build and grow a new party from scratch.  So we’re not serving their leadership, we’re using the house that once was theirs after we deal with the RINO infestation.

We can’t bungle 2010.  While we’re not going to win them all, we don’t have to settle for less than we need either.  Fortunately, the latest string of nominations demonstrates that most of us realize that, so we’re off to a good start.

Hey, How About We Let Obama Turn Off the Internet?

Is anyone else not liking that question?

Well, a bill to do just that has made it to the floor of the Senate.  Nicknamed the “kill switch” bill, it would allow the President to shut down the Internet without oversight for up to four months.  Past that, he needs Congressional approval.

The bottom line?  Obama.  Internet opposition control.  No oversight.

Lieberman, one of the bill’s sponsors, says it’s modeled after a law in China.  Even better reason not to have it around.  Furthermore, the facts that he would look to a law in China for good cybersecurity and Internet policy, his vote for Obamacare (cloture), and the fact he’s a friend of McCain’s are enough good reasons to cost this fool his job the next chance we get.

The sad thing is that this bill has been restricted from what it was.  Still, I’m thinking that if it passes, every four months around election time will be an Internet Emergency of Epic Proportions.  Normally, this sort of thinking would get me wondering if I should take off the tinfoil hat, but we are talking about Obama and the Democrats.  Don’t put it past them.

The Latest on McCain-Hayworth

If you’re a maverick supporter of John McCain, the news isn’t good.  But it’s time for a compilation nonetheless.  One is long overdue, in fact.

McCain is way up in the polls for the moment.  Hayworth is having some difficulty with a scandal involving an infomercial about free government money, and it’s hit him where it hurts in the numbers.  He’s responded, but so far no change.

The National Review endorsed McCain, but damn him with faint praise.  Essentially, they’re picking him over Hayworth because of his supposed status as a fiscal hawk.  Calling yourself a fiscal hawk after voting for TARP:  cheap lip-service conservatism.  Getting away with it, if he does:  priceless, and annoying.

As for Arizona?  They might want to reconsider giving their maverick support to John McCain.  It’s not as though they could do worse.  He’s been on the wrong side of some very big issues, and has a history of impersonating a reasonable conservative just long enough to get re-elected.  Six years is a long time to regret another bungle like McCain.

This time, he also has enough clout to impede the Republican fight against the Democrats.  If nothing else, he’ll be back to forcing their cooperation with Senate Gangs of Fail.  He’s already shown it on issues like cap-and-trade, amnesty, bailouts like TARP, 1st amendment rights violations (McCain-Feingold), judges (Gang of 14), and anything else mavericky that crosses his mind.

He’s done it in the past, only this time he’s not just a RINO hack.  He’s the RINO hack senior Senator and former Presidential candidates.  After playing conservative for so long, he’s going to want to grandstand again and soak up his press.  So if nothing else, Hayworth is too junior to be anywhere near that kind of threat, faults and all.

Lesser evil choices are no fun, but the one in November will be worse.  Let’s hope Arizona decides to turn over a new leaf and get rid of McCain in August.  It’s not over until it’s over, and we could still be rid of The Maverick once and for all.

Thoughts on Robert Byrd

Robert Byrd, Senator from West Virginia, died last night at the age of 92.  As I did with Kennedy, I won’t say much about it as I have nothing pleasant to mention.  His passing is noteworthy, which is the only reason I mention it here.

For now, his chair is vacant.  I’m not entirely sure of how much he was doing up to this point, but it’s official now.  Furthermore, West Virginia doesn’t appear to be in much of a hurry to fill the seat with a duly elected representative.  However, I doubt it will stay so vacant through 2012 as is the current plan.

If nothing else, West Virginia is going to want a second Senator.  For all I know, they may have been wanting it for a few years.  So it’s Democrat rubber stamp appointment time.  The question now is if everyone will wait until 2012 before they can elect someone else or sue first.

On a more general note, how many of these politicians have to die in office?  Can’t someone figure out how destructive a few of them are, and get rid of them?  Or are we just that lost for the moment?

Addendum:  Corrected a momentary lapse of reason.  This entire blog may well be one, but this post was in need of it most.